Advertisement

EQ-5D-3L Norms for the European Older Population: Country-Specific Norms for 15 European Countires Based on the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe

Published:November 14, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.2478

      Highlights

      • Enabling older people—the largest population group in most European countries—to sustain or add quality to years of life in old age challenges many countries.
      • The EQ-5D measures the impact of health on quality of life. Although it is often used in population health surveys, older adults have rarely been differentiated in general population surveys using EQ-5D. This study provides a 3-level version of the EQ-5D population norm data for the 50-plus-year-old Europeans using the cross-sectional Study of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe data.
      • These can serve as a reference that may help researchers and healthcare practitioners benchmark and interpret their results, inform policy, and support health decisions.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      This study presents a country-specific 3-level version of EQ-5D population norms for the European older population.

      Methods

      Norm data were obtained from the fourth wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, and determined, for each EQ-5D dimension, the EQ–visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) and EQ-5D index values by 7 age groups and sex for 15 European countries. The EQ-5D index values were calculated using the European VAS value set for all countries.

      Results

      Data resulting from 50 013 older respondents (mean age 65.9 years, range 50-111 years, 55.6% women) revealed an increasing number of self-reported health problems on EQ-5D dimensions and decreasing EQ-VAS scores with increasing age and for women compared with men. There are notable differences between countries in terms of the age gradient, the proportion of respondents in full health, and sex. Across all age groups, problems with pain & discomfort are the most frequent (36%-73% any problems), whereas problems with self-care are the least frequent (3%-31% any problems). The mean EQ-VAS score is 71.2 and the mean European VAS score is 0.79.

      Conclusions

      Given the growing number of older adults and elderly people in Europe, these population norms provide a valuable source of reference data that can be used to compare older adults or patient subgroups to the average of the general elderly population in a similar age or sex group in 15 European countries. The index value results may be further used to assess the burden of disease across older European populations and to identify the unmet needs of targeted older patient populations.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Value in Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division
        World population prospects: the 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248. United Nations.
        • Fuster V.
        Changing demographics: a new approach to global health care due to the aging population.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69: 3002-3005
        • Grundy E.M.
        • Murphy M.
        Population aging in Europe.
        in: Michel J.P. Beattie B.L. Martin F.C. Walston J.D. Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England2018: 11-18
      1. Europe in figures – Eurostat yearbook 2010. European Commission; 2020.
        (Accessed January 4, 2022)
        • Eurostat. Statistics Explained
        Population projection in the EU.
        • Bowling A.
        Quality of life in older age: what older people say.
        in: Quality of Life in Old Age. Social Indicators Research Series. vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2007https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_2
        • Lestari S.K.
        • de Luna X.
        • Eriksson M.
        • Malmberg G.
        • Ng N.
        A longitudinal study on social support, social participation, and older Europeans’ quality of life.
        SSM Popul Health. 2021; 3100747
        • Divo M.J.
        • Martinez C.H.
        • Mannino D.M.
        Ageing and the epidemiology of multimorbidity.
        Eur Respir J. 2014; 44: 1055-1068
        • Jaul E.
        • Barron J.
        Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population.
        Front Public Health. 2017; 5: 335
        • Kehler D.S.
        Age-related disease burden as a measure of population ageing.
        Lancet Public Health. 2019; 4: e123-e124
        • Palladino R.
        • Lee J.T.
        • Ashworth M.
        • Triassi M.
        • Millett C.
        Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 European countries.
        Age and Ageing. 2016; 45: 431-435
        • Atella V.
        • Mortari A.P.
        • Kopinska J.
        • et al.
        Trends in age-related disease burden and healthcare utilization.
        Aging Cell. 2019; 18e12861
        • Chang A.Y.
        • Skirbell V.F.
        • Tyrovolas S.
        • Kassebaum N.J.
        • Dieleman J.L.
        Measuring population ageing: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
        Lancet Public Health. 2019; 4: e159-e167
        • OECD/European Union
        A Good Life in Old Age?: Monitoring and Improving Quality in Long-term Care.
        OECD/European Commission, OECD Publishing, Paris2013
      2. Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. World Health Organization.
      3. World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization; 2019.
        (Accessed January 3, 2022)
        • Moons P.
        • Budts W.
        • De Geest S.
        Critique on the conceptualization of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 43: 891-901
        • Vanleerberghe P.
        • De Witte N.
        • Claes C.
        • Schalock R.L.
        • Verté D.
        The quality of life of older people aging in place: a literature review.
        Qual Life Res. 2017; 26: 2899-2907
        • van Leeuwen K.M.
        • van Loon M.S.
        • van Nes F.A.
        • et al.
        What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis.
        PLoS One. 2019; 14e0213263
        • Karimi M.
        • Brazier J.
        Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference?.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2016; 34: 645-649
        • Janssen M.F.
        • Pickard A.S.
        • Shaw J.W.
        General population normative data for the EQ-5D-3L in the five largest European economies.
        Eur J Health Econ. 2021; 22: 1467-1475
        • König H.H.
        • Heider D.
        • Lehnert T.
        • et al.
        Health status of the advanced elderly in six European countries: results from a representative survey using EQ-5D and SF-12.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8: 143-153
        • Szende A.
        • Janssen B.
        • Cabases J.
        Self-Reported Population-Health: An International Perspective Based on EQ-5D.
        Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2014
        • EuroQol Group
        EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.
        Health Policy. 1990; 16: 199-208
        • Janssen M.F.
        • Szende A.
        • Cabases J.
        • Ramos-Goñi J.M.
        • Vilagut G.
        • König H.H.
        Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L: a cross-country analysis of population surveys for 20 countries.
        Eur J Health Econ. 2019; 20: 205-216
        • König H.H.
        • Brettschneider C.
        • Lühmann D.
        • et al.
        EQ-5D-3L health status and health state utilities of the oldest-old (85+) in Germany: results from the AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe study.
        Qual Life Res. 2020; 29: 3223-3232
        • Luthy C.
        • Cedraschi C.
        • Allaz A.F.
        • Herrmann F.R.
        • Ludwig C.
        Health status and quality of life: results from a national survey in a community-dwelling sample of elderly people.
        Qual Life Res. 2015; 24: 1687-1696
        • Börsch-Supan A.
        Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 4. Release version: 8.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. Data set.
      4. Bergmann M, Kneip T, De Luca G, Scherpenzeel A. Survey participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), wave 1-7. Based on release 7.0.0. 2019, Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy; SHARE Working Paper Series 41-2019.

      5. Release guide 7.0.0. SHARE.
        • De Luca G.
        • Rossetti C.
        Stata program to compute calibrated weights from scientific use file and additional database. SERISS.
      6. Data access. SHARE.
        http://www.share-project.org/data-access.html
        Date accessed: November 19, 2021
      7. Mehrbrodt T, Gruber S. Wagner M. Scales and multi-item indicators in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. 2019, SHARE Working Paper Series 45-2019.

        • Greiner W.
        • the Rotterdam Analysis Team
        A European EQ-5D VAS valuation set.
        in: Brooks R. Rabin R. de Charro F. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: a European Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2003: 103-142
        • Szende A.
        • Oppe M.
        • Devlin N.
        EQ-5D Value Sets: Inventory, Comparative Review and User Guide.
        Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2007
        • Xie F.
        • Gaebel K.
        • Perampaladas K.
        • Doble B.
        • Pullenayegum E.
        Comparing EQ-5D valuation studies: a systematic review and methodological reporting checklist.
        Med Decis Making. 2014; 34: 8-20
        • Devlin N.
        • Parkin D.
        • Janssen B.
        Methods for Analysing and Reporting EQ-5D Data.
        Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2020
        • Zrubka Z.
        • Golicki D.
        • Prevolnik-Rupel V.
        • et al.
        Towards a Central-Eastern European EQ-5D-3L population norm: comparing data from Hungarian, Polish, and Slovenian population studies.
        Eur J Health Econ. 2019; 20: S141-S154
        • Mangen M.J.
        • Bolkenbaas M.
        • Huijts S.M.
        • van Werkhoven C.H.
        • Bonten M.J.
        • de Wit G.A.
        Quality of life in community-dwelling Dutch elderly measured by EQ-5D-3L.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017; 15: 3
        • Wang S.C.
        • Sung W.W.
        • Kao Y.L.
        • et al.
        The gender difference and mortality-to-incidence ratio relate to health care disparities in bladder cancer: national estimates from 33 countries.
        Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 4360
        • Harnois C.E.
        • Bastos J.L.
        Discrimination, harassment, and gendered health inequalities: do perceptions of workplace mistreatment contribute to the gender gap in self-reported health?.
        J Health Soc Behav. 2018; 59: 283-299
        • Aguilar-Palacio I.
        • Gil-Lacruz A.I.
        • Sánchez-Recio R.
        • Rabanaque M.J.
        Self-rated health in Europe and its determinants: does generation matter?.
        Int J Public Health. 2018; 63: 223-232
      8. Vanier A, Oort FJ, McClimans L, et al. Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: definition, theory, and a revised model [published correction appears in Qual Life Res. 2021;30(12):3323-3324]. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(12):3309-3322.

        • Barcley R.
        • Tate R.B.
        Response shift recalibration and reprioritization in health-related quality of life was identified prospectively in older men with and without stroke.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67: 500-507
        • Daltroy L.H.
        • Larson M.G.
        • Eaton H.M.
        • Phillips C.B.
        • Liang M.H.
        Discrepancies between self-reported and observed physical function in the elderly: the influence of response shift and other factors.
        Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48: 1549-1561
        • Schwartz C.E.
        • Andresen E.M.
        • Nosek M.A.
        • Krahn G.L.
        RRTC Expert Panel on Health Status Measurement. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 529-536
        • Golicki D.
        • Niewada M.
        General population reference values for 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire in Poland.
        Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015; 125: 18-26
        • Ferreira L.N.
        • Ferreira P.L.
        • Pereira L.N.
        • Oppe M.
        EQ-5D Portuguese population norms.
        Qual Life Res. 2014; 23: 425-430
        • Scalone L.
        • Cortesi P.A.
        • Ciampichini R.
        • Cesana G.
        • Mantovani L.G.
        Health related quality of life norm data of the general population in Italy: results using the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L instruments.
        Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2015; 12e11457
        • Bailey H.
        • Janssen M.F.
        • La Foucade A.
        • Boodraj G.
        • Wharton M.
        • Castillo P.
        EQ-5D self-reported health in Barbados and Jamaica with EQ-5D-5L population norms for the English-speaking Caribbean.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021; 19: 97
        • Feng Y.
        • Devlin N.
        • Herdman M.
        Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13: 171
        • Hernandez G.
        • Garin O.
        • Pardo Y.
        • et al.
        Validity of the EQ-5D-5L and reference norms for the Spanish population.
        Qual Life Res. 2018; 27: 2337-2348
        • Huber M.B.
        • Felix J.
        • Vogelmann M.
        • Leidl R.
        Health-related quality of life of the General German population in 2015: results from the EQ-5D-5L.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14: 426
        • Jiang R.
        • Janssen M.F.B.
        • Pickard A.S.
        US population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and comparison of norms from face-to-face and online samples.
        Qual Life Res. 2021; 30: 803-816
        • Pentek M.
        • Hajdu O.
        • Rencz F.
        • et al.
        Subjective expectations regarding ageing: a cross-sectional online population survey in Hungary.
        Eur J Health Econ. 2019; 20: 17-30
        • Shiroiwa T.
        • Fukuda T.
        • Ikeda S.
        • et al.
        Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D.
        Qual Life Res. 2016; 25: 707-719
        • Buchholz I.
        • Janssen M.F.
        • Kohlmann T.
        • Feng Y.S.
        A systematic review of studies comparing the measurement properties of the three-level and five-level versions of the EQ-5D.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36: 645-661
      9. Position statement on use of the EQ-5D-5L value set for England. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
        • Mesle F.
        • Vallin J.
        The end of east–west divergence in European life expectancies? An introduction to the special issue.
        Eur J Popul. 2019; 33: 615-627