Economic Evaluations of Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review

Published:January 11, 2022DOI:


      • Remote patient monitoring (RPM) can be effective in preventing escalation to acute care and has the potential to improve chronic disease management. There has also been a renewed interest in the cost-effectiveness of RPM since the onset of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The cost and outcome evidence for RPM has been summarized for some disease-specific contexts (eg, heart failure); however, there are no existing summaries of the available health economic evidence of noninvasive RPM for chronic disease management.
      • This systematic review identified and summarized 34 articles that conducted economic evaluations of noninvasive RPM compared with usual care for chronic disease management. This review demonstrated that RPM can be cost-effective for chronic disease management, although the cost-effectiveness is dependent on capital investment, clinical context, willingness-to-pay thresholds, and the organizational processes involved in RPM implementation and provision.
      • Overarching health economic evidence of RPM is useful for decision makers that are contemplating RPM investment choices for chronic disease management. Compared with usual care, RPM was highly cost-effective for hypertension, where greater cost savings may be achieved in the long term because of prevention of high-cost health events. For chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure, cost-effectiveness findings often differed according to disease severity. There was limited evidence for the cost-effectiveness of RPM for diabetes and other chronic diseases.



      This study aimed to systematically review and summarize economic evaluations of noninvasive remote patient monitoring (RPM) for chronic diseases compared with usual care.


      A systematic literature search identified economic evaluations of RPM for chronic diseases, compared with usual care. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and EconLit using keyword synonyms for RPM and economics identified articles published from up until September 2021. Title, abstract, and full-text reviews were conducted. Data extraction of study characteristics and health economic findings was performed. Article reporting quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist.


      This review demonstrated that the cost-effectiveness of RPM was dependent on clinical context, capital investment, organizational processes, and willingness to pay in each specific setting. RPM was found to be highly cost-effective for hypertension and may be cost-effective for heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There were few studies that investigated RPM for diabetes or other chronic diseases. Studies were of high reporting quality, with an average Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards score of 81%. Of the final 34 included studies, most were conducted from the healthcare system perspective. Eighteen studies used cost-utility analysis, 4 used cost-effectiveness analysis, 2 combined cost-utility analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis, 1 used cost-consequence analysis, 1 used cost-benefit analysis, and 8 used cost-minimization analysis.


      RPM was highly cost-effective for hypertension and may achieve greater long-term cost savings from the prevention of high-cost health events. For chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure, cost-effectiveness findings differed according to disease severity and there was limited economic evidence for diabetes interventions.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Value in Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Malasinghe L.P.
        • Ramzan N.
        • Dahal K.
        Remote patient monitoring: a comprehensive study.
        J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2019; 10: 57-76
        • De Guzman K.R.
        • Snoswell C.L.
        • Taylor M.L.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of pediatric telediabetes service models.
        Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020; 22: 623-638
        • Noah B.
        • Keller M.S.
        • Mosadeghi S.
        • et al.
        Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        npj Digit Med. 2018; 1: 20172
        • Taylor M.L.
        • Thomas E.E.
        • Snoswell C.L.
        • Smith A.C.
        • Caffery L.J.
        Does remote patient monitoring reduce acute care use? A systematic review.
        BMJ Open. 2021; 11e040232
        • Crosland P.
        • Ananthapavan J.
        • Davison J.
        • Lambert M.
        • Carter R.
        The economic cost of preventable disease in Australia: a systematic review of estimates and methods.
        Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019; 43: 484-495
        • Bloom D.E.
        • Chen S.
        • Kuhn M.
        • McGovern M.E.
        • Oxley L.
        • Prettner K.
        The economic burden of chronic diseases: estimates and projections for China, Japan, and South Korea.
        J Econ Ageing. 2020; 17100163
        • Murphy A.
        • Mahal A.
        • Richardson E.
        • Moran A.E.
        The economic burden of chronic disease care faced by households in Ukraine: a cross-sectional matching study of angina patients.
        Int J Equity Health. 2013; 12: 38
        • Rudmik L.
        • Drummond M.
        Health economic evaluation: important principles and methodology.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 1341-1347
        • Snoswell C.
        • Smith A.C.
        • Scuffham P.A.
        • Whitty J.A.
        Economic evaluation strategies in telehealth: obtaining a more holistic valuation of telehealth interventions.
        J Telemed Telecare. 2017; 23: 792-796
        • Seto E.
        Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review.
        Telemed J E-Health. 2008; 14: 679-686
        • Klersy C.
        • De Silvestri A.
        • Gabutti G.
        • et al.
        Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure.
        Eur J Heart Fail. 2011; 13: 450-459
        • Whitten P.S.
        • Mair F.S.
        • Haycox A.
        • May C.R.
        • Williams T.L.
        • Hellmich S.
        Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 1434
        • Snoswell C.L.
        • Taylor M.L.
        • Comans T.A.
        • Smith A.C.
        • Gray L.C.
        • Caffery L.J.
        Determining if telehealth can reduce health system costs: scoping review.
        J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22e17298
        • Peretz D.
        • Arnaert A.
        • Ponzoni N.N.
        Determining the cost of implementing and operating a remote patient monitoring programme for the elderly with chronic conditions: a systematic review of economic evaluations.
        J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24: 13-21
        • De Guzman K.R.
        • Snoswell C.S.
        • Taylor M.
        • Caffery L.J.
        • Gray L.
        Economic evidence of remote patient monitoring: a systematic review. PROSPERO CRD42021248908.
        • Mandrik O.
        • Severens J.L.
        • Bardach A.
        • et al.
        Critical appraisal of systematic reviews with costs and cost-effectiveness outcomes: an ISPOR good practices task force report.
        Value Health. 2021; 24: 463-472
        • Shemilt I.
        • Thomas J.
        • Morciano M.
        A web-based tool for adjusting costs to a specific target currency and price year.
        Evid Policy. 2010; 6: 51-60
        • Husereau D.
        • Drummond M.
        • Petrou S.
        • et al.
        Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.
        BMJ. 2013; 346: f1049
        • Ariza J.G.
        • Walton S.M.
        • Sanabria M.
        • Bunch A.
        • Vesga J.
        • Rivera A.
        Evaluating a remote patient monitoring program for automated peritoneal dialysis.
        Perit Dial Int. 2020; 40: 377-383
        • Achelrod D.
        • Schreyogg J.
        • Stargardt T.
        Health-economic evaluation of home telemonitoring for COPD in Germany: evidence from a large population-based cohort.
        Eur J Health Econ. 2017; 18: 869-882
        • Clarke M.
        • Fursse J.
        • Brown-Connolly N.E.
        • Sharma U.
        • Jones R.
        Evaluation of the National Health Service (NHS) direct pilot telehealth program: cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Telemed J E-Health. 2018; 24: 67-76
        • Dehmer S.P.
        • Maciosek M.V.
        • Trower N.K.
        • et al.
        Economic evaluation of the home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management to control hypertension (hyperlink) trial.
        J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2018; 1: 21-30
        • Ferguson T.W.
        • Hager D.
        • Whitlock R.H.
        • et al.
        A cost-minimization analysis of nurse-led virtual case management in late-stage CKD.
        Kidenty Int. Rep. 2020; 5: 851-859
        • Grustam A.S.
        • Severens J.L.
        • De Massari D.
        • Buyukkaramikli N.
        • Koymans R.
        • Vrijhoef H.J.M.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis in telehealth: a comparison between home telemonitoring, nurse telephone support, and usual care in chronic heart failure management.
        Value Health. 2018; 21: 772-782
        • Henderson C.
        • Knapp M.
        • Fernandez J.L.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial.
        Age Ageing. 2014; 43: 794-800
        • Hofer F.
        • Achelrod D.
        • Stargardt T.
        Cost-utility analysis of telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Germany.
        Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016; 14: 691-701
        • Jiang X.
        • Yao J.
        • You J.H.
        Telemonitoring versus usual care for elderly patients with heart failure discharged from the hospital in the United States: cost-effectiveness analysis.
        J Med Internet Res. 2020; 8e17846
        • Jodar-Sanchez F.
        • Ortega F.
        • Parra C.
        • et al.
        Cost-utility analysis of a telehealth programme for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with long-term oxygen therapy.
        J Telemed Telecare. 2014; 20: 307-316
        • Kaambwa B.
        • Bryan S.
        • Jowett S.
        • et al.
        Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014; 21: 1517-1530
        • Madsen L.B.
        • Christiansen T.
        • Kirkegaard P.
        • Pedersen E.B.
        Economic evaluation of home blood pressure telemonitoring: a randomized controlled trial.
        Blood Press. 2011; 20: 117-125
        • Monahan M.
        • Jowett S.
        • Nickless A.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring and self-monitoring of blood pressure for antihypertensive titration in primary care (TASMINH4).
        Hypertension. 2019; 73: 1231-1239
        • Padwal R.S.
        • So H.
        • Wood P.W.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring and case management in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease in Canada.
        J Clin Hypertens. 2019; 21: 159-168
        • Pare G.
        • Poba-Nzaou P.
        • Sicotte C.
        Home telemonitoring for chronic disease management: an economic assessment.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013; 29: 155-161
        • Paré G.
        • Poba-Nzaou P.
        • Sicotte C.
        • et al.
        Comparing the costs of home telemonitoring and usual care of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled trial.
        Eur Res Telemed. 2013; 2: 35-47
        • Schroettner J.
        • Lassnig A.
        Simulation model for cost estimation of integrated care concepts of heart failure patients.
        Health Econ Rev. 2013; 3: 26
        • Stoddart A.
        • Hanley J.
        • Wild S.
        • et al.
        Telemonitoring-based service redesign for the management of uncontrolled hypertension (HITS): cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
        BMJ Open. 2013; 3e002681
        • Stoddart A.
        • van der Pol M.
        • Pinnock H.
        • et al.
        Telemonitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cost and cost-utility analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
        J Telemed Telecare. 2015; 21: 108-118
        • Tagliente I.
        • Trieste L.
        • Solvoll T.
        • Murgia F.
        • Bella S.
        Telemonitoring in Cystic Fibrosis: a 4-year Assessment and Simulation for the next 6 years.
        Indian J Med Res. 2016; 5: e11
        • Thokala P.
        • Dodd P.
        • Baalbaki H.
        • Brennan A.
        • Dixon S.
        • Lowrie K.
        Developing markov models from real-world data: A case study of heart failure modeling using administrative data.
        Value Health. 2020; 23: 743-750
        • Van Dyck W.
        • Vértes G.
        • Palaniappan M.
        • et al.
        Acute coronary syndrome: what is the cost-effectiveness of prevention, point-of-care technology and telemonitoring?.
        Health Policy Technol. 2012; 1: 173-177
        • Vestergaard A.S.
        • Hansen L.
        • Sorensen S.S.
        • Jensen M.B.
        • Ehlers L.H.
        Is telehealthcare for heart failure patients cost-effective? An economic evaluation alongside the Danish TeleCare North heart failure trial.
        BMJ Open. 2020; 10e031670
        • Williams C.
        • Wan T.T.
        A cost analysis of remote monitoring in a heart failure program.
        Home Health Care Serv Q. 2016; 35: 112-122
        • Witt Udsen F.
        • Lilholt P.H.
        • Hejlesen O.
        • Ehlers L.
        Cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the Danish ‘TeleCare North’ cluster-randomised trial.
        BMJ Open. 2017; 7e014616
        • Witt Udsen F.
        • Lilholt P.H.
        • Hejlesen O.K.
        • Ehlers L.H.
        Subgroup analysis of telehealthcare for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the cluster-randomized Danish Telecare North Trial.
        Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017; 9: 391-401
        • Wittenborn J.S.
        • Clemons T.
        • Regillo C.
        • Rayess N.
        • Liffmann Kruger D.
        • Rein D.
        Economic evaluation of a home-based age-related macular degeneration monitoring system.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017; 135: 452-459
      1. Bloom PP, Ventoso M, Tapper E, Ha J, Richter JM. A telemonitoring intervention for cirrhotic ascites management is cost-saving [published online May 6, 2021]. Dig Dis Sci.

        • Bohingamu Mudiyanselage S.
        • Stevens J.
        • Watts J.J.
        • et al.
        Personalised telehealth intervention for chronic disease management: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
        J Telemed Telecare. 2019; 25: 343-352
        • Boodoo C.
        • Zhang Q.
        • Ross H.J.
        • Alba A.C.
        • Laporte A.
        • Seto E.
        Evaluation of a heart failure telemonitoring program through a microsimulation model: cost-utility analysis.
        J Med Internet Res. 2020/10/6; 22 (2020:e18917)
      2. Esteban C, Antón A, Moraza J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a telemonitoring program (telEPOC program) in frequently admitted chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients [published online August 9, 2021]. J Telemed Telecare.

        • Ionov M.V.
        • Zhukova O.V.
        • Yudina Y.S.
        • et al.
        Value-based approach to blood pressure telemonitoring and remote counseling in hypertensive patients.
        Blood Press. 2021; 30: 20-30
      3. Teo VH, Teo SH, Burkill SM, et al. Effects of technology-enabled blood pressure monitoring in primary care: a quasi-experimental trial [published online July 30, 2021]. J Telemed Telecare.

        • Soran O.Z.
        • Feldman A.M.
        • Piña I.L.
        • et al.
        Cost of medical services in older patients with heart failure: those receiving enhanced monitoring using a computer-based telephonic monitoring system compared with those in usual care: the Heart Failure Home Care trial.
        J Card Fail. 2010; 16: 859-866
        • Loh P.K.
        • Sabesan S.
        • Allen D.
        • et al.
        Practical aspects of telehealth: financial considerations.
        IMJ Ill Med J. 2013; 43: 829-834
        • Zhai Y.K.
        • Zhu W.J.
        • Cai Y.L.
        • Sun D.X.
        • Zhao J.
        Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Medicine. 2014; 93 (e312-e312)
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Lee S.W.H.
        Telemedicine cost-effectiveness for diabetes management: a systematic review.
        Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018; 20: 492-500
        • Briggs A.
        Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation.
        BMJ. 1999; 319: 120
        • Reardon T.
        Research findings and strategies for assessing telemedicine costs.
        Telemed J E-Health. 2005; 11: 348-369
        • Woods B.
        • Revill P.
        • Sculpher M.
        • Claxton K.
        Country-level cost-effectiveness thresholds: initial estimates and the need for further research.
        Value Health. 2016; 19: 929-935
        • Nimdet K.
        • Ngorsuraches S.
        Willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year for life-saving treatments in Thailand.
        BMJ Open. 2015; 5e008123
        • Towse A.
        Should NICE’s threshold range for cost per QALY be raised? Yes.
        BMJ. 2009; 338: b181
        • Gandjour A.
        Willingness to pay for new medicines: a step towards narrowing the gap between NICE and IQWiG.
        BMC. 2020; 20: 343