Advertisement

Medicaid Expansion’s Impact on Emergency Department Use by State and Payer

  • Fan Zhao
    Affiliations
    Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Roch A. Nianogo
    Correspondence
    Correspondence: Roch A. Nianogo, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Dr South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    California Center for Population Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 25, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.014

      Highlights

      • Existing evidence on how the Medicaid Expansion Program affects inefficient and expensive emergency department (ED) visits is inconsistent.
      • The Medicaid expansion increased Medicaid’s share of ED visits and decreased private insurance’s share of ED visits. Uninsured share of ED visits decreased in most states, especially in the same states that experienced the largest increase of Medicaid enrollment.
      • States that experienced the largest increase (>60%) in Medicaid enrollment seem to experience an increase in total ED visits although such results did not reach statistical significance.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      The Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid Expansion Program influences healthcare use by increasing insurance coverage. Of particular interest is how this will affect inefficient and expensive emergency department (ED) visits. We estimated the impact of the Medicaid expansion on ED use by states and payer (Medicaid, private insurance, and uninsured) 5 years after the implementation of the Medicaid expansion and illustrated the use of the generalized synthetic control method.

      Methods

      In this quasi-experiment study, we implemented the generalized synthetic control method to compare states with Medicaid expansion and states without Medicaid expansion. Data were from the Healthcare Cost Utilization Project Fast Stats, which cover >95% of all ED visits. We included states with complete data from 2010 to 2018.

      Results

      Overall, the Medicaid expansion increased Medicaid share of ED visits (average treatment effect on the treated [ATT] 11.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.76-14.02) and decreased private share of ED visits (ATT −5.80%; 95% CI −7.40 to −4.12) and uninsured share of ED visits (ATT −6.66%; 95% CI −9.78 to −3.55).

      Conclusions

      Medicaid Expansion Program shifted ED payer mix to Medicaid ED visits from private insurance and uninsured ED visits for adults at age of 19 to 64 years, whereas its effect on total ED volume is mixed among states. States that experienced the largest increase in Medicaid enrollment seem to experience an increase in ED visits although such results did not reach statistical significance.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Value in Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Improving health for all Americans. The White House.
      2. Overview of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid. MACPAC.
      3. Status of state Medicaid expansion decisions: interactive map. Kaiser Family Foundation.
        • Truffer C.
        • Rennie K.
        • Wilson L.
        • Eckstein E.
        2018 Actuarial report on the financial outlook for Medicaid. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
        (Accessed October 29, 2020)
      4. The latest emergency department utilization numbers are in. ACEP Now.
        • Zuckerman S.
        • Brennan N.
        • Yemane A.
        Has Medicaid managed care affected beneficiary access and use?.
        Inquiry. 2002; 39: 221-242
        • Decker S.L.
        In 2011 nearly one-third of physicians said they would not accept new Medicaid patients, but rising fees may help.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2012; 31: 1673-1679
        • Taubman S.L.
        • Allen H.L.
        • Wright B.J.
        • Baicker K.
        • Finkelstein A.N.
        Medicaid increases emergency-department use: evidence from Oregon's Health Insurance Experiment.
        Science. 2014; 343: 263-268
        • Finkelstein A.
        • Taubman S.
        • Wright B.
        • et al.
        The Oregon health insurance experiment: evidence from the first year.
        Q J Econ. 2012; 127: 1057-1106
        • Miller S.
        The effect of insurance on emergency room visits: an analysis of the 2006 Massachusetts health reform.
        J Public Econ. 2012; 96: 893-908
        • Smulowitz P.B.
        • O’Malley J.
        • Yang X.
        • Landon B.E.
        Increased use of the emergency department after health care reform in Massachusetts.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 64: 107-115.e3
        • Wall J.K.
        “Payer mix” playing role in hospital merger. Indianapolis Business Journal.
        • Sabik L.M.
        • Cunningham P.J.
        • Tehrani A.B.
        Changes in emergency department utilization after early Medicaid expansion in California.
        Med Care. 2017; 55: 576-582
        • Nikpay S.
        • Freedman S.
        • Levy H.
        • Buchmueller T.
        Effect of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion on emergency department visits: evidence from state-level emergency department databases.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 70: 215-225.e6
        • Pines J.M.
        • Zocchi M.
        • Moghtaderi A.
        • et al.
        Medicaid expansion in 2014 did not increase emergency department use but did change insurance payer mix.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2016; 35: 1480-1486
        • Xu Y.
        Generalized synthetic control method: causal inference with interactive fixed effects models.
        Polit Anal. 2017; 25: 57-76
      5. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Health Research and Quality.
        https://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/index.html
        Date accessed: November 3, 2020
      6. Explore census data. United States Census Bureau.
        https://data.census.gov/cedsci/
        Date accessed: November 3, 2020
      7. America’s health rankings: annual report. United Health Foundation.
      8. Total monthly Medicaid/CHIP enrollment and pre-ACA enrollment. Kaiser Family Foundation.
        • Dresden S.M.
        • Powell E.S.
        • Kang R.
        • McHugh M.
        • Cooper A.J.
        • Feinglass J.
        Increased emergency department use in Illinois after implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 69: 172-180
        • Coe A.B.
        • Moczygemba L.R.
        • Ogbonna K.C.
        • Parsons P.L.
        • Slattum P.W.
        • Mazmanian P.E.
        Predictors of emergent emergency department visits and costs in community-dwelling older adults.
        Health Serv Insights. 2018; 111178632918790256
        • Salam-White L.
        • Hirdes J.P.
        • Poss J.W.
        • Blums J.
        Predictors of emergency room visits or acute hospital admissions prior to death among hospice palliative care clients in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study.
        BMC Palliat Care. 2014; 13 (35-35)
        • Thakarar K.
        • Morgan J.R.
        • Gaeta J.M.
        • Hohl C.
        • Drainoni M.L.
        Predictors of frequent emergency room visits among a homeless population.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0124552
        • Sommers B.D.
        • Baicker K.
        • Epstein A.M.
        Mortality and access to care among adults after state Medicaid expansions.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1025-1034
        • Magge H.
        • Cabral H.J.
        • Kazis L.E.
        • Sommers B.D.
        Prevalence and predictors of underinsurance among low-income adults.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28: 1136-1142
        • Morgan S.L.
        • Winship C.
        Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research.
        2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom2014
        • Xu Y.
        • Liu L.
        gsynth: generalized synthetic Control Method. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
        (Accessed October 29, 2020)
        • R Core Team
        The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
        (Accessed October 29, 2020)
        • Viechtbauer W.
        Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package.
        J Stat Softw. 2010; 36: 1-48
        • Ginde A.A.
        • Lowe R.A.
        • Wiler J.L.
        Health insurance status change and emergency department use among US adults.
        Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172: 642-647
        • Park J.J.
        • Sommers B.D.
        • Humble S.
        • Epstein A.M.
        • Colditz G.A.
        • Koh H.K.
        Medicaid and private insurance coverage for low-income Asian Americans, native Hawaiians, and pacific islanders, 2010-16.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38: 1911-1917
        • Blavin F.
        • Karpman M.
        • Kenney G.M.
        • Sommers B.D.
        Medicaid versus marketplace coverage for near-poor adults: effects on out-of-pocket spending and coverage.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2018; 37: 299-307
        • Berdahl T.A.
        • Moriya A.S.
        Difference in uninsurance rates between full- and part-time workers declined in 2014.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2018; 37: 1669-1672
      9. Where are states today? Medicaid and CHIP eligibility levels for adults, children, and pregnant women. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.
      10. Medicaid income eligibility limits for adults as a percent of the federal poverty level. Kaiser Family Foundation.
        • Kullar D.
        • Chokshi D.A.
        Health, income, & poverty: where we are & what could help. HealthAffairs.
        • McConville S.
        • Raven M.C.
        • Sabbagh S.H.
        • Hsia R.Y.
        Frequent emergency department users: A statewide comparison before and after affordable care act implementation.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2018; 37: 881-889
        • Medford-Davis L.N.
        • Eswaran V.
        • Shah R.M.
        • Dark C.
        The patient protection and affordable care act’s effect on emergency medicine: a synthesis of the data.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 66: 496-506
        • Rhodes K.V.
        • Kenney G.M.
        • Friedman A.B.
        • et al.
        Primary care access for new patients on the eve of health care reform.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 861-869
        • Kellermann A.L.
        • Martinez R.
        The ER, 50 years on.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2278-2279
        • Asplin B.R.
        • Knopp R.K.
        A room with a view: on-call specialist panels and other health policy challenges in the emergency department.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 37: 500-503
      11. FastStats: emergency department visits. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
        • Miller S.
        The effect of the Massachusetts reform on health care utilization.
        Inquiry. 2012; 49: 317-326
        • Basu S.
        • Meghani A.
        • Siddiqi A.
        Evaluating the health impact of large-scale public policy changes: classical and novel approaches.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2017; 38: 351-370
        • Selden T.M.
        • Lipton B.J.
        • Decker S.L.
        Medicaid expansion and marketplace eligibility both increased coverage, with trade-offs in access, affordability.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36: 2069-2077