Value in Health
Volume 14, Issue 8 , Pages 967-977, December 2011

Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument

  • Donald L. Patrick, PhD, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Donald L. Patrick, University of Washington—Health Services, PO Box 359455 SeaQoL Group, Seattle, WA 98195-9455, USA
  • ,
  • Laurie B. Burke, RPh, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Chad J. Gwaltney, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, and PRO Consulting, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Nancy Kline Leidy, PhD

      Affiliations

    • United BioSource Corporation, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Mona L. Martin, RN, MPA

      Affiliations

    • Health Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Molsen, RN

      Affiliations

    • International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
  • ,
  • Lena Ring, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Health Economics & Outcomes Research Division, AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden, and Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

published online 14 October 2011.

Abstract 

The importance of content validity in developing patient reported outcomes (PRO) instruments is stressed by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Content validity is the extent to which an instrument measures the important aspects of concepts that developers or users purport it to assess. A PRO instrument measures the concepts most significant and relevant to a patient's condition and its treatment. For PRO instruments, items and domains as reflected in the scores of an instrument should be important to the target population and comprehensive with respect to patient concerns. Documentation of target population input in item generation, as well as evaluation of patient understanding through cognitive interviewing, can provide the evidence for content validity. Developing content for, and assessing respondent understanding of, newly developed PRO instruments for medical product evaluation will be discussed in this two-part ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report. Topics include the methods for generating items, documenting item development, coding of qualitative data from item generation, cognitive interviewing, and tracking item development through the various stages of research and preparing this tracking for submission to regulatory agencies. Part 1 covers elicitation of key concepts using qualitative focus groups and/or interviews to inform content and structure of a new PRO instrument. Part 2 covers the instrument development process, the assessment of patient understanding of the draft instrument using cognitive interviews and steps for instrument revision. The two parts are meant to be read together. They are intended to offer suggestions for good practices in planning, executing, and documenting qualitative studies that are used to support the content validity of PRO instruments to be used in medical product evaluation.

Keywords:  content validity , European Medicines Agency , Food and Drug Administration , patient reported outcomes , quality of life

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Authors listed in alphabetical order after lead author.

PII: S1098-3015(11)03323-7

doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014

Value in Health
Volume 14, Issue 8 , Pages 967-977, December 2011